“Suddenly, the economics of American suburban life are under assault as skyrocketing energy prices inflate the costs of reaching, heating and cooling homes on the distant edges of metropolitan areas.”
The article quotes Phil Doyle, a homeowner in the countryside of Denver, who says about his daily hour-long commute to the city, “Before it was ‘we spend too much time driving.’ Now, it’s ‘we spend too much time and money driving.’ ”
In less than five years, the average suburban household is paying more than double what they used to pay for their gasoline consumption, amounting to a yearly increase of over $1700. This contributed to larger and earlier drops in the prices of these homes than those in the city.
I’m all for city living, reducing urban sprawl and densification if you live AND work there. However, a lot of infrastructure has already been built out to suburban areas, including multi-billion dollar investments in mass transportation systems to increase access to the city core.
Maybe it’s time to start investing in renewable energy technologies for lighting, heating and cooling in these faraway developments, to offset the higher costs of commuting. It would be an interesting exercise to calculate the household payback of installing solar photovoltaic panels, solar hot water heating systems and geothermal systems for homes in these areas. I’m sure it’s a lot more attractive than it was just a year ago. If you also eliminated all the long-distance commuting, you would spend less time and money driving and be doing the planet a big favour too.
So— my dream house is a net zero energy home in the boonies that’s totally self-sufficient in water use and onsite waste management. I can grow much of my own food onsite. And I don’t have to commute anywhere for a living.